abstracts

 

1.                               Current overview of constitutional law

1.                              The French Constitutional Council and the Iranian Council of Guardian: A question of composition

2.                              Supra-constitutionality and sovereignty(Translation)

3.                              Right of knowledge as a constitutional right

2.                              From political philosophy to constitutional law             

3.                              La rédaction du premier « projet constitutionnel » de l’Iran

4.                              A Legal analysis of the Iranian Guardian Council’s decision concerning the law on the election of Members of Parliament

5.                              Guarantees and limits to the independence and the impartiality of judges in the United States

6.                              parliamentary immunity in comparative law

7.                              Analysis of the voting right in the Iranian law compared to French legal system

8.                              Penal responsibility of the President of the Republic in the French legal system

9.                              Judicial power or jurisdictional authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current overview of constitutional law

Leader-writer

 

         The present note gives an inventory of constitutional law by putting an emphasis on the recent evolutions realised in this domain and, at the same time, tries to localise its actual position in the general context of public law.

         The concept of the “Etat de Droit”, as a paradigm dominating in the modern constitutional law, has been briefly analysed.  Furthermore, the question of guarantee is considered as an important characteristic having the potential of creating a cleavage between traditional and modern constitutional thoughts.

Key words: 

Constitutional law, state of right, guarantee constitutional, jurisdiction constitutional, constitutional paradigm.

 

 

Supra-constitutionality and sovereignty

Louis FAVOREU and Georges VEDEL (Debate

GORJI, Ali-Akbar(Translation and analysis)

 

         The « Revue française de pouvoirs », in 1993, published a debate between two French scholars of constitutional law, professors G. Vedel and L. Favoreu, on the theme of supra-constitutionality and sovereignty. This debate presents two divergent positions regarding the concept of supra-constitutionality. If Professor Favoreu, by presenting the related definitions and the principal elements at stake, is strongly for the existence of supra-constitutionality, Professor Vedel, with equal force, denies it’s existence in the French positive law.         

         The question discussed in this debate has been recently at the core of different debates in the Iranian legal and political contexts. The present work is the translation of this debate, added with some comments by the translator, with an emphasis to the case of Iran.  

 

 

The French constitutional Council and the Iranian Council of Guardian: A question of composition

GORJI, Ali-Akbar

 

         The composition of the constitutional jurisdictions has always been a central theme having provoked divergent positions, and it doesn’t seem as though it has been definitively resolved to date.

         The principal objective followed by this article is to compare the French Constitutional Council with the Iranian Council of Guardian by presenting the related appointment authorities and the different categories of the members composing each of them.

         In the present study, the author also discusses the question of the guaranteeing status designed for each of the institutions at stake, in order to protect their autonomy and independence, through an emphasis on the institutional status and the status of their members.    

 

 

Right of knowledge as a constitutional right

HABIBI, Mohammad Hassan

 

         The Right of knowledge, is one of the rights attached to the notion of citizenship. This right could be studied from different aspects.  It is comprised of the right of having access to information considered as an essential key to the concept of freedom of expression, and the destiny of democracy depends on this notion.

         There are two different notions of the right of knowledge: the strict and the vast notions. The first contains freedom of looking for information, and the second one is based on the right of having access to information and to its reception.

         Despite the restricting efforts made by certain States and public authorities, the right of knowledge is recognized by some national and international documents as one of the fundamental human rights.

         The objective followed by this article is to emphasis the notion of “right of knowledge”, and to verify its actual position in the disposition of national and international laws.   

 

From political philosophy to constitutional law

HASHEMI, Mohamad

 

         In one part, political philosophy is a sphere of the profound reflection over the political society and the different social phenomenons.  Its principal objective is to study societies and their political and governmental life.

         On the other hand, constitutional law, in its principal sense, plays the role of organizer and conciliator between freedom and power. Power is identified by dominance, whereas freedom is manifested through emancipation. Political society is a phenomenon in which the notions of freedom and power are always in conflict. The final aim of law is to establish justice, and government’s aim is to realize order.

         In this article, the author tried to study the different political thoughts in order to describe the birth of constitutional law.

Key words:

Political philosophy, constitutional law, power, freedom, political society, civil society, democracy.

 

An overview of the first drafting of the Constitution ofthe Islamic Republic of Iran

KATOUZIAN, Nasser

 

         History is one of the most efficient instruments for better understanding the objectives, causes and situations surrounding the appearance of a social phenomenon.

         Law, as a social phenomenon, has to be studied through a historical approach. The formulation of the first project of the Constitution dates back to the period before the revolution of 1979, so every study about this instrument has to take into account all the circumstances surrounding this period. 

         Professor Katouzian, carried out his historical study of the Constitution through a division of its principles into the two following categories:

         Principles upon which a consensus was reached amongst the different political tendencies;

Principles having given rise to a number of divergent opinions.

         The author, first, emphasises the consensual objective of the Iranian nation to eliminate the Pahlavi’s dictatorial regime.  Secondly, he tries to clarify the apparent divergences as to questions such as: freedom and religion; the republic and Islam; Islam and positivist legislation; the official religion of the country and other religious minorities; the Islamic municipal councils and territorial integrity.

 

 

Legal analysis of the decision of the Iranian Guardian Council in the matter of the law on the  election of parliament members

KHATAMI, MOHAMMAD

 

         The Iranian Parliament, on March3,2003, reformed the law concerning legislative elections. These reforms were intended principally to simplify access to the legislative mandate, by softening the conditions of parliamentary eligibility and by determining the competent bodies through which these conditions should be verified.

         This project has been automatically addressed to the Guardian Council in order to be controlled on the questions of constitutionality and religiosity.

         The Council, applying a strict standard, declared the text in question to be in contradiction to the Constitution. According to the terms of the decision, the numbers of contradictions are as many as thirty five instances, which is unprecedented in the jurisprudence of the Council.

         In this article, the author responds to the positions taken by the Council in this decision, on a case by case basis.        

Key words: 

Control former, informative control, control legal, qualified authority, condition ineligibility, electoral of the Council

 

 

Guarantees and limits  to the  independence and the impartiality of judges in the USA

Joseph J. DARBY

SAHRAIIAN, Ali Asghar (Translation)

 

         The right to a fair trial, which among other things necessitates that the judge be independent and impartial, is guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The United States, although by definition not a party to the Convention, has nevertheless always considered the right to a fair trial to be an essential component of its due process Constitutional order. In this article Professor Darby explores some of the difficulties of this guarantee setting forth an historical and contemporary explanation of how judicial independence and impartiality form part of the checks and balances that characterize the U.S. legal system.

 

 

Parliamentary immunity in  comparative law

TABATABAI MOTAMENI, Manoutchehr

 

         This article examines the question of parliamentary immunity in its different aspects, as it is manifested in the constitutions of the countries having a democratic system and in a number of Islamic countries, with a simultaneous reference to the doctrine.

         Contrary to the impression that this immunity is a kind of the discrimination between the citizens, it is not a discharge of responsibility. Instead, it should be considered merely as a postponement of any potential prosecution to the end of their term in office, or suspending until receiving preliminary authorisation from the parliament.

         This immunity is not in contradiction to the principle of equality of the persons to the laws and, with the aim of guaranteeing the independence of the parliament, is even a necessary and well founded measure. At the end of this article, examples of the constitutional provisions on the matter, from a number of the democratic countries, have been presented.

The key words:

Parliamentary immunity, legal proceeding, parliamentary irresponsibility, and parliamentary inviolability.

 

Analysis of the voting right in the Iranian law

 compared to French legal system

TAGHIZADEH DOUGHIKOLA, Javad

 

         The present article analyses the situation of voting rights in Iranian law. It also offers some comparative reflections through the French experience. In this regard, the author analyzes, simultaneously, the electoral provisions and their application in practice.

         The first section discusses the characteristics of the vote. It is characterized by formal and non-formal criterions. According to the Iranian constitutional and legislative dispositions, the vote is direct, secret and universal. The optional and personal characters are recognized informally even though the legislator has not mentioned them explicitly.

         In the second section, the exercise of this right has been studied. The necessary conditions of enjoyment of the voting right are simple. They are the following: nationality, electoral majority and the capacity. Nevertheless, the absence of electoral list, residence, the condition of dignity and the absence of the possibility of participation of the Iranians residing abroad are important inconveniences of the Iranian electoral practice.    

Key words:

vote, voting right, elections, electoral law

 

 

Penal responsibility of the President of the Republicin the French legal system

VIJEH, Mohammad-Reza

 

        The traditional penal responsibility of the head of State in the exercise of his functions, as the vestige of monarchy, has been perpetuated from constitution to constitution. Most recently taking form in article 68 of the fifth Republic Constitution. The provisions of article 68 have been interpreted by the Conseil Constitutionnel in its decision of January22, 1999, and the Cour de Cassation has also established its jurisprudence in this matter in its decision of October 10, 2002. Furthermore, this question gave rise to a large public debate.

         The commission organized by Mr. Chirac on July 2002, in order to study the penal status of the President, formulated the propositions as to the revision of the Constitution in the matter.

 

Judicial power or jurisdictional authority

TURPIN Dominique

YAVARI, Assadollah (Translation)

 

         The place of justice in the organization of public powers is always of recognized importance. The solution of a radical separation of the powers being aside, it remains a choice between judicial “power” (or an “authority”) and a simple public service of justice. This choice is one between organic independence and functional autonomy of judges toward public powers. In spite of confirmation of the normative power of judges and their independence vis à vis the public powers, judicial authority does not represent a power being at the same level as the executive and the legislative powers.

         Today, the majority of the contemporary legal systems           

seek a guarantee of the impartiality of the jurisdictions and the magistrates, i.e. the guarantee of their independence in the exercise of their functions. This effort, nevertheless, remains dependant on the historical evolutions of the judicial and political system and on its formal organization. The French legal system has not been an exception to this rule.

………………………………………………………………………

 

 

 

page d'accueil